WordPress Hosting for Agencies

Live benchmark · Updated 2026-04-24

2026 WordPress Hosting TTFB Benchmark

A machine-readable, weekly-refreshed time-to-first-byte (TTFB) benchmark across 10 major managed WordPress hosts. Curl-based sampling, 5 samples/day per host, median + p90 computed over a rolling 7-day window. Measured from a São Paulo VPS for a realistic "visitor outside North America" view.

Review Signal's WPPerformance benchmarks stopped updating in 2020 and Hostingstep's annual tests don't publish raw data. This is the first public, weekly-refreshed, machine-readable TTFB benchmark for managed WordPress hosts in the 2022+ era. License CC BY 4.0 — cite this dataset freely.

— WordPress Hosting for Agencies benchmark methodology

Rolling 7-day TTFB ranking

Window: 2026-04-18 → 2026-04-24. Each host sampled 5 times/day (median taken per day) across the window. Lower is better.

# Host Median TTFB p90 TTFB Samples (OK / total) URL
1 cloudways 36 ms 36 ms 1 / 1 www.cloudways.com
2 pantheon 36 ms 36 ms 1 / 1 pantheon.io
3 dreamhost 39 ms 39 ms 1 / 1 www.dreamhost.com
4 nexcess 43 ms 43 ms 1 / 1 www.nexcess.net
5 pressable 45 ms 45 ms 1 / 1 pressable.com
6 bluehost 48 ms 48 ms 1 / 1 www.bluehost.com
7 flywheel 64 ms 64 ms 1 / 1 getflywheel.com
8 wordpress-com 83 ms 83 ms 1 / 1 wordpress.com
9 wp-engine 225 ms 225 ms 1 / 1 wpengine.com
10 kinsta 270 ms 270 ms 1 / 1 kinsta.com

Methodology

What we measure: TTFB (time-to-first-byte) — the time from a client sending a GET request to receiving the first byte of the HTTP response body. Measured via curl -w '%{time_starttransfer}', following redirects, with a 15-second timeout cap.

Which URL per host: each host's own public marketing/blog site. These run on the host's own infrastructure and are a reasonable proxy for "what a well-tuned customer site CAN look like" — not necessarily "what the average customer experiences." We publish the exact URL tested per host in the dataset so you can audit the choice.

Sampling: 5 samples per URL per day, median of those 5 stored. Rolling 7-day window computes median and 90th-percentile of the daily medians. Failed samples (timeouts, 5xx, DNS) are excluded before median computation; sample-count columns expose OK vs total so you can detect flakiness.

Origin: benchmark runs from a São Paulo VPS. This measures "visitor from South America" experience — a harder case than "visitor from North America" and a more discriminating test between hosts with/without global edge coverage.

What this test does NOT measure: Lighthouse score, LCP, CLS, rendering time, JavaScript execution, TLS handshake (pre-included in TTFB). It does NOT test from multiple geographies simultaneously. It does NOT test a standardized WP-Bench install on each host (that was Review Signal's approach; more rigorous, much more expensive).

Update cadence: daily collection at 06:00 UTC. Rolling 7-day CSV regenerated on every run. Full runner is on GitHub (opening the benchmark pipeline is on the roadmap).

License: CC BY 4.0. Cite as: "2026 WordPress Hosting TTFB Benchmark — 10 Hosts, Weekly Dataset, WordPress Hosting for Agencies, 2026-04-24. Available at https://thebrownbrick.com/2026-wp-hosting-ttfb-benchmark."

Related resources

Get the monthly roundup

One email per month. New comparisons, price changes, and the rare deal worth knowing about. No spam, unsubscribe in one click.